Legal Opinion

Burrage v. Bucknam

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 26, 1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

In Bucknam v. Bucknam, 294 Mass. 214, we decided that Theresa R. Bucknam, as the former wife of Robert Horton Bucknam, was barred from reaching and applying in payment of alimony and for support of a minor child, and from enforcing an assignment of, the income payable to Robert Horton Bucknam under the terms of a trust contained in the will of his mother, Mary Helen Bucknam, because of the spendthrift clause constituting the seventh paragraph of that will. We there adverted to the settled law of this Commonwealth sustaining the validity of spendthrift provisions for the protection of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Matter of Sand v. BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Van Dyke v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. In Re Trust Created by MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Pemberton v. PembertonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API