Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Husted

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Emil Alfred Nelson against William A. Husted] George F. Barlow, and Edward E.. Barlow. On demurrer to amended bill.

1Opinion of the Court

WIEEARD, District Judge.

In this suit in equity the complainant is a citizen of the state of Minnesota, residing in the village of Hal-lock, which is in the Sixth division of this district. The defendants are citizens of the state of Illinois. The suit is sought to be maintained under the provisions of section 8 of the judiciary act (Act March 3, 1875, c. 137, 18 Stat. 472 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 513]).. That section provides that when a suit is “commenced in any Circuit Court of the United States, to enforce any legal or equitable lien upon, or claim to or to remove any incumbrance or lien…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. MacOn Grocery Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  2. Muller v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Dillon v. RinglemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. McClurg v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  5. Camp v. BonsalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API