Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Perdue v. Jablonsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Victor M. Ort, J.

In these habeas corpus petitions, petitioners, State-ready inmates, seek to compel respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) to accept them into the State prison system. Petitioners Perdue, Arrington, and Itua who were all sentenced to State prison, ask to be transferred to the State system or, in the alternative, to be credited with "work release points” while they remain in local custody. Petitioners Clemente, Morales, and Arroyo, who are parole violators, request to be transferred back to their State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Division of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In re David C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Crespo v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. GoordNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People ex rel. Carillo v. BasiloneNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People ex rel. McKnight v. MeloniNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ban v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API