Legal Opinion

Crespo v. Hall

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1982PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

The unambiguous statutory scheme establishes that, immediately upon sentencing, a juvenile offender must be committed to the custody of the Director of the State Division for Youth (DFY) for confinement in a secure DFY facility. CPL 430.20 (subd 1) provides that “[w]hen a sentence of imprisonment is pronounced * * * the defendant must forthwith be committed to the custody of the appropriate public servant” (emphasis added). In…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. County of Nassau v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Wallace v. ConroyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. County of Onondaga v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. County of Nassau v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API