Legal Opinion
Evanston Insurance v. Fred A. Tucker & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1989No. Nos. 87-4274, 87-4275PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
A request for publication of the Memorandum filed on February 27,1989 is granted. The disposition will be refiled as a per curiam published Opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
We construe a provision of an “Insurance Agents and Brokers Liability Policy” and determine the standing of James Ro-thaus and the Insurance Company of North America (“INAPRO”) to appeal a declaratory judgment entered against other defendants.
FACTS
Fred A. Tucker, Jr., and James Rothaus were Washington insurance brokers. In July 1982, Harold Hansen and Severin Hjelle requested that Tucker and Rothaus obtain marine insurance on their two…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Libby, McNeill, & Libby v. City National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Federated American Insurance v. StrongWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
4Cited by2 opinions
- Ternes v. GalichiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Evanston Insurance Company v. Fred A. Tucker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989