Legal Opinion
Ternes v. Galichia
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 26, 2013No. 101,666PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of die court was delivered by
Rosen, J.:
In this procedurally complicated medical malpractice action, issues of standing and the application of a statute of limitations defense are raised by the intervening attorneys, who are also defendants in a separate, but related, legal malpractice action. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court and remanded for a trial, and this court granted review.
The plaintiff in this action, Herman M. Ternes, was injured on March 5, 2004, in tire course of surgery performed by Joseph P. Galichia, M.D. On February 9, 2005, Ternes sought legal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Schipporeit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States of America, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago, William C. Bigby, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Peterson v. FerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Kansas Building Industry Workers Compensation Fund v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Harsay v. University of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Baker v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.