United Buying Group, Inc. v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
These appeals present the question of whether the courts of North Carolina can exercise personal jurisdiction over either of *28the defendants. The question involves a two-part inquiry. Before the court may exercise jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, it must have statutory authorization and its exercise of such jurisdiction must comport with the requirements of due process. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674, 231 S.E. 2d 629 (1977).
This Court analyzed a similar set of facts in First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. McDaniel and held that “[w]here the nonresident…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Chadbourn, Inc. v. KatzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- FIRST-CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Hunter-Hayes Elevator Co. v. Petroleum Club Inn Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991