Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Aeolian Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This is an action by a stockholder against The Aeolian Company, a foreign corporation, and the members of its board of directors. The amended complaint pleads two causes of action — the first for a judgment of rescission of plaintiff’s consent to the reorganization plan adopted July 20, 1932, and for a rescission of the transaction whereby plaintiff exchanged fifty shares of the preferred stock of said company for fifty shares class A preferred stock and certain notes of said corporation, because of alleged fraud and misrepresentations made to plaintiff by the officers and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Ernst v. Rutherford & Boiling Springs Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Powell v. United Ass'n of Plumbers & Steamfitters of United States & CanadaNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Cuppy v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Lind v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Ackert v. AusmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gilbert v. BurnsideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Newman v. United Profit-Sharing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API