Shelnutt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
A jury found Rodney Shelnutt and his brother, Joe Shelnutt, guilty of aggravated assault. Arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdicts and that their trial counsel was ineffective in several particulars, they appeal from the judgments of conviction entered upon the jury’s verdicts.
1. The Shelnutts challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support their convictions, arguing each had an alibi and there was no physical evidence supporting the verdicts. On appeal, this court does not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Van Alstine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Bowley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Pittman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005