Dickerson v. State

Ruffin, Chief budge.

A jury found ¡Carlos Dickerson guilty of armed robbery and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. Dickerson appeals, asserting' that insufficient evidence supports his convictions. He also claims that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial and in overruling his objections after two witnesses violated a pretrial ruling. Finally, he argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. Dickerson argues that the trial court should have directed a verdict in his favor because the State failed to present…