Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of Lynn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, C. J.

This is an action of tort in the nature of trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close, digging up and subverting the soil, carrying away large quantities of earth and gravel and inundating thirty acres of land.

The defendant justifies its acts as having been done for the purpose of supplying the city and its inhabitants with pure water, under the St. of 1871, c. 218.

■The first section of that statute authorized the city for that purpose “ to take, hold and convey into and through said city the waters of Breed’s Pond, so called, in said city, and the waters which flow into and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Housatonic Railroad v. Lee & Hudson RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Pinkerton v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Jeffries v. Inhabitants of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drury v. Midland RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Wamesit Power Co. v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Woodbury v. Marblehead Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Warren v. Spencer Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Kenison v. Inhabitants of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API