Legal Opinion

Moore v. Melaleuca, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2002No. 27078PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is a review of the Industrial Commission’s decision granting unemployment benefits to Tina Moore. The employer, Melaleuca, Inc., is the appellant. The Department of Labor and the employee, Moore, are the respondents. Melaleuca argues that the Commission erred by deciding that Moore’s appeal by protest of an adverse eligibility determination by a claims examiner was timely, and that the Commission erred further when it decided ultimately, on the merits, that Moore was entitled to unemployment benefits. The Department of Labor joins in Melaleuca’s contention that Moore’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pyeatt v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Striebeck v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ullrich v. Thorpe ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Welch v. Cowles Publishing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hart v. Deary High SchoolIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Obenchain v. McAlvain Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ewins v. Allied SecurityIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. McNulty v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Higgins v. Larry Miller Subaru-MitsubishiIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API