Legal Opinion
ConMed Corp. v. Erbe Electromedizin GmbH
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 16, 2003No. 00-CV-0987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 22, 2000, plaintiffs ConMed Corporation (“ConMed”) and Aspen Laboratories, Inc. (“Aspen”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), commenced the instant action against defendants Erbe Electromedizin GmbH and Erbe USA, Inc. (collectively “Erbe” or “defendants”), pursuant to 22 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 1338, and the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, and various state laws. Plaintiffs are asserting seven causes of action: First — for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of patent; Second — a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- B & G PLASTICS, INC. v. Eastern Creative Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003