Legal Opinion

Duron v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. 89-06-23; CA A66673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Employer seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) holding him liable for an additional premium for workers’ compensation insurance. We reverse.

Employer is a construction contractor specializing in the installation of roofing. SAIF is employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier. Beginning in 1981, SAIF approved employer’s use of three risk classifications for the work activities of his employees. That use continued through 1988. In 1989, SAIF audited employer’s 1988 payroll and charged him an additional premium of $5,887.05 for that year.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. SatterfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mr. Lustre Car Care Center v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Duron v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Duron v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API