Legal Opinion

Duron v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1992No. 89-06-23; CA A66673PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

SAIF petitions for review of our decision, 111 Or App 571, 826 P2d 107 (1992), arguing that we erred in concluding that it was not entitled to bill employer for an additional premium for workers’ compensation insurance. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.

National Council on Compensation Insurance also petitions for review. We deny its petition without discussion.

SAIF contends that we erred by not remanding to the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) to determine the factual issues raised by the application of ORS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duron v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API