Legal Opinion

People v. Keith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress an inculpatory remark allegedly made during the booking process. The remark was made after defendant “requested and obtained a brief response from the arresting officer as to why he was being charged” (People v Rivers, 56 NY2d 476, 478, rearg denied 57 NY2d 775). We conclude that the officer’s response was “a simple statement of fact, not provocative in any sense” (People v Howard, 60 NY2d 999, 1001; see, People v Arch, 265 AD2d 868, lv denied 94 NY2d 860). We reject defendant’s contentions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. ArchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API