People v. Arch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress inculpatory statements that he made while an investigator was asking routine booking questions after defendant’s right to counsel had attached (see, People v Lipscomb, 214 AD2d 970, lv denied 86 NY2d 797, cert denied 516 US 1078). The investigator testified at the Huntley hearing that, when defendant asked him with what crime he was being charged, the investigator replied, “robbery, first degree.” Defendant stated that robbery first degree required that he have a gun or other weapon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. LipscombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. KeithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000