Legal Opinion

United States v. Bogucki

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 2, 2018No. Case No. 18-cr-00021-CRB-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge

The government has charged Robert Bogucki, a trader at Barclays Bank, with wire fraud, alleging that Bogucki deceived Hewlett Packard ("HP") in a 2011 options trade. Bogucki moves to dismiss on the ground that the indictment is time-barred. While the government returned the indictment outside the five-year statute of limitations normally applicable to wire fraud, it argues that it is nevertheless timely under a 10-year statute of limitations applicable to fraud that "affects a financial institution." See 18 U.S.C. § 3293(2). Bogucki counters that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Tesla Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API