Legal Opinion

Pohl v. Fulton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1911No. 17,259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff, Louis H. Pohl, brought suit to recover on a promissory note, and to foreclose a real-estate mortgage securing the note, given by John A. Fulton to the plaintiff’s deceased wife, Belle B. Pohl, who was formerly the wife of Luther J. Stimple. The note was a renewal of a former note given by Fulton to I. B. Stimple (Belle B. Stimple) while she was a widow. The Stimples had an imbecile son, Hiram Stimple, whose guardian defended the action on the ground that the note and mortgage belonged to him. The plaintiff was defeated and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Love v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Williamson v. YagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. Abegg v. HirstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Barnhouse v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Hudson, Administrator v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Ariett v. Osage County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Cooey v. CooeySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Hamilton v. CaplanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API