Legal Opinion

Maunder v. Pozzo

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1917No. L. A. No. 3993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

appeal from a judgment for damages for personal injuries and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

Defendants were general contractors engaged in the erection of a building. Plaintiff was a subcontractor who had undertaken the construction of the stairs in the building. While he was employed about his task he was struck by a piece of brick falling from the floor above the temporary stairway upon which he was at work. The result was an injury which caused the loss of one of plaintiff’s eyes. Judgment was given in his favor for one thousand two hundred dollars.

Before the findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bovais v. CassassaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API