Boyd v. Pollard
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Demetrius Boyd, a Wisconsin inmate, claims that a guard used excessive force in moving him between cells, and that the prison warden and two subordinates were deliberately indifferent to unsanitary conditions in the new cell. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on both of these Eighth Amendment claims, and we affirm.
Boyd was removed from his cell by five guards, including defendant Joseph Beahm. At summary judgment the district court received evidence of the cell extraction from three sources: Boyd’s affidavit, Beahm’s affidavit, and a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Estate of Rice Ex Rel. Rice v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Lewis v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allgood v. GommDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Alvarado v. BeahmDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Anderson, Darrick v. Columbia Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Blakes v. KentrellDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Bradley v. BeahmDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.