Legal Opinion

Alvarado v. Beahm

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 9, 2024No. 2:21-cv-00186Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RAMON ALVARADO, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-CV-186 JOSEPH BEAHM, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Ramon Alvarado, Jr., who is incarcerated and representing himself, brings this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Alvarado was allowed to proceed on an excessive force claim against the defendants for allegedly using excessive force on him during a cell extraction and subsequent strip search. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Alvarado has responded in opposition.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Gunville v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API