Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Barbour

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 24, 1986No. 83-555PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Defendant, James Barbour, appeals an order of the trial court claiming that the court abused its discretion in refusing to incorporate the terms of the parties’ stipulation into the final divorce decree. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand the case for further proceedings.

The parties to the divorce, Kay and James Barbour, entered into a stipulation which they asked the court to incorporate into the final order. The stipulation provided that the Barbours would have joint custody of their two children, then aged 14 and 13. The *508children were to spend alternate weeks living with each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Mayer v. MayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  3. Lumbra v. LumbraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. Strope v. StropeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Berlin v. BerlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Nevitt v. NevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Peckham v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Bancroft v. BancroftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Plante v. PlanteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API