Legal Opinion

Plante v. Plante

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 10, 1987No. 86-087PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The plaintiff-appellant, Vera Plante, obtained a divorce from the defendant-appellee on the ground that the parties lived separate and apart for six consecutive months and the resumption of marital relations was not reasonably probable. 15 V.S.A. § 551(7). The trial court made findings of fact, decreed the disposition of property, 15 V.S.A. § 751, and decreed custody of both of the parties’ children, a son aged 16 and a daughter aged 14, to the defendant. 15 V.S.A. § 652. The court also granted visitation rights to the plaintiff “as permitted by the father and at such times, duration and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Emmons v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Daitchman v. DaitchmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  3. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  4. Hogel v. HogelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Barbour v. BarbourSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. DeLeonardis v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. Peckham v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Nuse v. NuseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API