Legal Opinion
Carbon Activated Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 2015No. 2015-1112PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Carbon Activated Corp. (“Carbon”) appeals a decision of the United States Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Carbon’s challenge to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) liquidation of three entries of activated carbon. Because Carbon could have availed itself of the jurisdictional provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) by filing a timely protest under 19 U.S.C. § 1514, there is no jurisdiction under § 1581(i). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Carbon imported from the People’s Republic of China (“China”) three entries…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- International Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arp Materials, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Acquisition 362, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- TR Int'l Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Thyssenkrupp Steel North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.