Carter v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Plumas County distributing the proceeds of the sale of attached property. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The facts out of which the controversy in this case arises are as follows:—
*223The defendant was a corporation engaged in quartz-mining at Orescent. Mills, in Plumas County. On the 30th of September, 1887, the plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant to recover a debt due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered, and at the same time took out a writ of attachment, which on the next day was levied by the sheriff on all of defendant’s personal property. Such proceedings were afterward had in the action that on the 24th of October, 1887, judgment for more than…
2Cited by3 opinions
- North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Taylor v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Alexander v. ArcherNevada Supreme Court · 1890