Legal Opinion

Huebner v. Furlinger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2017No. 20160269Published

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald and Sherry Huebner appeal a district court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment and judgment denying their request to quiet title in certain Burke County mineral interests. The Huebners argue the district court erred in ruling they did not comply with the notice requirements in the abandoned mineral statutes, N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The Huebners are the current surface owners of property in Burke County and suceessors-in-interest to Eugene Hu-ebner and Harold Wilkens. In 2006 the Huebners took steps to claim unused mineral…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Nelson v. McAlester Fuel CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Johnson v. TaliaferroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Capps v. WeflenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API