Legal Opinion
VALENZUELA-FELIX
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2012No. ID 3773PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 53
(BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3773 Matter of Jaime Enrique VALENZUELA-FELIX, Respondent Decided November 16, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals When the Department of Homeland Security paroles a returning lawful permanent resident for prosecution, it need not have all the evidence to sustain its burden of proving that the alien is an applicant for admission but may ordinarily rely on the results of a subsequent prosecution to meet that burden in later removal proceedings. FOR RESPONDENT: Geoffrey A. Hoffman,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Vartelas v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Taniguchi v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ricardo Lara-Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- LOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Patel v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Rogelio Vazquez Romero v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Minto v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Agustin Ortega-Lopez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.