Bachner Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This appeal is from the refusal of a new trial in a condemnation ease on the grounds of improper exclusion of evidence and prejudicial error of law in the trial court’s oral charge to the jury.
By ordinance No. 141 of 1932, the city of Pittsburgh, appellant, authorized and directed a change of grade and widening of Chartiers Avenue from Bucyrus Street to Corliss Street, and by another ordinance, No. 145 of 1932, established the width and position of the sidewalks and the roadway and reestablished the grade. Appellees are owners of a property abutting on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Mutual Life Ins. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Dilts v. Plumville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Wilson v. City of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- McGunnegle v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Dickel v. Bucks-Falls Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Redevelopment Authority of City of Erie v. Owners or Parties in InterestCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Beaver Falls Municipal Authority for Penndale Water Line Extension v. Beaver Falls Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Cavalier AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Situate & Being in the ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.