Legal Opinion

State v. Horn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of carnally and unlawfully knowing a female child under the age of sixteen years, and sentenced to two years' imprisonment. From this judgment he appeals.

The view we take of the case renders a statement of the facts on the merits unnecessary.

[1] Irrespective of exceptions [State v. Barr, 326 Mo. l.c. 1100, 34 S.W.2d l.c. 479 (4)], or assignments of error [State v. Lettrell (Mo.), 39 S.W.2d l.c. 557 (3)], it is our duty to consider the record proper [Sec. 3760, R.S. 1929, Mo. Stat. Ann., p. 3298, and cases cited; State v. Dimmick, 331 Mo. l.c. 247,53 S.W.2d 262 (4)],…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. State v. DimmickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Ballew v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. State v. PilkintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Downs v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DAMIEN T. BRYANMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API