Legal Opinion

State v. Pilkinton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1958No. 7625PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Presiding Judge.

Defendants, Ni and Mrs. Catherine (Ni) Pilkinton, appeal from the judgment entered upon the jury verdict finding them guilty of violation of the so-called compulsory school attendance law [Chapter 164] and assessing the punishment of each defendant at a fine of $10. Section 164.060. (All statutory references herein are to RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.)

Following a practice neither helpful nor commendable [Mannon v. Frick, 365 Mo. 1203, 1205, 295 S.W.2d 158, 161], the state has filed no brief and rests on a seven-line “motion to dismiss appeal” (unsupported by suggestions or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Mannon v. FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. State v. FranciesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DePoortere v. Commercial Credit CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. AchterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State v. SegoviaIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Special District for the Education & Training of Handicapped Children of St. Louis County v. WheelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API