Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

O. G. Hempstead & Son v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 3120PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

O. G. Hempstead & Son imported certain articles at the port of Philadelphia, entered variously as "chemical glassware” and "scientific glassware.” The samples introduced in evidence show the merchandise to be of six kinds, namely: First, Exhibit A. Spirit hydro-meters, with proof and Tralle scales, which hydrometers are used to determine the alcoholic content in distilled liquor. Second, Exhibit-B. Similar spirit hydrometers equipped with thermometers for guidance in testing, and lettered “U. S. Customs House hydrometer for spirit.” Third, Exhibit C. Hydrometers used in testing the specific…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Chesterton Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. KastorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. Massachusetts General HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  4. United States v. Wyman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Robertson v. OelschlaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. R. J. Saunders & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Ayers v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. International General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Conover v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. United States v. A. S. Aloe Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API