Legal Opinion
Beatty v. Lincoln Bus Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 23, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The objection to the complaint is that separate causes of action are joined therein as against several defendants sued severally and not jointly; which is the fact.
Plaintiff is the receiver of a mutual insurance company of this state and, as such receiver, claims to be entitled to collect the whole or unpaid part of a large number of assessments made by direction of the Court of Chancery against parties who had insured with the compan}', among whom are the three defendants. See Lincoln Bus Co. v. Jersey Mutual Casually Insurance Co., 112 N. J. Eq. 538; 165 Atl. Rep. 112. The motion to strike,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fish v. . VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- Lincoln Bus Co. v. Jersey Mutual, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Cramp & Co. v. DoughtySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Davis v. GronerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lyle v. KeehnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Broderick v. AbramsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934