Legal Opinion
Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 19, 1968No. 16282PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Vornado, Inc., has appealed from a judgment dismissing a complaint which alleged in substance that a resale price maintenance agreement entered into by the defendant-appellee, Corning Glass Works, with the defendant-appellees, the Lehroffs and with H. Schultz & Sons to enforce Coming’s fair trade program constitutes a violation of the antitrust laws of the United States. An appeal also has been taken by Vornado from a judgment entered upon Coming’s counterclaim restraining Vornado from violating the fair trade agreement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas Co. v. DiGaetanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Frank Fischer, C., Corp. v. Ritz Drug Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Menley & James Laboratories v. Vornado, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Gillette Company v. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. WeissbardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- V. & L. Cicione, Inc. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968