Legal Opinion

Beamer v. Franchise Tax Board

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1977No. S.F. 23591Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Cal.3d 467 (1977)

563 P.2d 238

138 Cal. Rptr. 199

SCOTT BEAMER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. S.F. 23591.

Supreme Court of California.

May 10, 1977.

COUNSEL

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorney General, Edward P. Hollingshead and Charles C. Kobayashi, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Aiken, Kramer & Cummings and John A. Harkavy for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

We consider here the deductibility under Revenue and Taxation Code section 17204[1] of certain taxes paid…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API