Legal Opinion
Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. APAC-Southeast, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 17, 2009No. A09A0081PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
This appeal concerns the construction of an insurance contract resolved by the trial court on summary judgment. The question presented is whether the plaintiff, APAC-Southeast, Inc., is an additional insured under an excess liability insurance policy issued by one of the defendants, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”)- The trial court answered the question in the affirmative. We agree and therefore affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Western Pacific Mutual Insurance v. DaviesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Tuten v. City of BrunswickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Albany Oil Mill, Inc. v. Sumter Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Collier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Forsyth County v. WATERSCAPE SERVICES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Alston & Bird LLP v. Mellon Ventures II, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Glass v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Sirdah v. NORTH SPRINGS ASSOCIATES, LLLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Estate of Pitts v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.