AAMCO Transmissions, Inc. v. James A. Bova

OPINION

Michael Massengale, Justice

In this . restricted . appeal, AAMCO Transmissions, Inc. contends that it is apparent from the face of the record that the trial court erred by entering a no-answer default judgment. The ostensible error consists of the fact that default judgment rests on the allegations of a petition that was amended to seék greater relief after the trial court orally rendered a default judgment. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.

Background

James Bova. filed a petition against AAMCO and two of its employees alleging causes of action for intentional infliction of…