Legal Opinion

United States v. Cho Po Sun

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 26, 1969No. 32337_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, District Judge:

After trial before Judge Frankel, sitting without a jury, appellant was found guilty of assaulting and interfering with a Federal Immigration Officer in violation of Title 18, U.S.Code, § 111. 1 Upon this appeal appellant contends for the first time that the Government failed to establish that at the time of the assault the officer assaulted was “engaged in * * * the performance of his official duties” as outlined in Title 8, U.S.Code, § 1357. 2 We reject that contention and affirm the judgment.

The assault occurred in the early afternoon of January 26, 1968. At that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Joseph MontanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Arwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Robert T. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Callahan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Juvenile FemaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Illinois Migrant Council v. PilliodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API