United States v. Cho Po Sun
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge:
After trial before Judge Frankel, sitting without a jury, appellant was found guilty of assaulting and interfering with a Federal Immigration Officer in violation of Title 18, U.S.Code, § 111. 1 Upon this appeal appellant contends for the first time that the Government failed to establish that at the time of the assault the officer assaulted was “engaged in * * * the performance of his official duties” as outlined in Title 8, U.S.Code, § 1357. 2 We reject that contention and affirm the judgment.
The assault occurred in the early afternoon of January 26, 1968. At that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Joseph MontanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Arwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert T. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Callahan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Juvenile FemaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Illinois Migrant Council v. PilliodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.