Legal Opinion

Metting v. Metting

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1968No. 14681PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Plaintiff, Robert Carl Metting, III, complains of the action of the trial court in overruling his motion for summary judg ment and dismissing his suit seeking the appointment of a receiver to assume control of so much of the estate of Bertha Metting, deceased, now in the hands of defendant, Robert Carl Metting, Jr., independent executor under Mrs. Metting’s will, as may be required to be sold in order to pay estate taxes owing to the United States.

The will of Bertha Metting, insofar as relevant to the disposition of this appeal, devised certain real property to plaintiff.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Griggs v. BrewsterTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stanley v. Henderson, Ind. Extr.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. O'Connor v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Bell v. StillTexas Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Oldham v. KeatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. In Re the Estate of Treviño, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  3. Laurie v. StabelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Gonzalez v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Kanz v. Hood, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API