Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Donahoe
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided November 7, 2014No. 13-2216-STA-dkvPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Patrick R. Donahoe’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19), filed on June 16, 2014. Plaintiff Ricky Taylor filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 23), to which the Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 32). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
I. Plaintiffs Dismissal
Plaintiff Ricky Taylor alleges that the Defendant unlawfully dismissed him from his job for engaging in prior protected activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mastellone v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016
- James v. McDonoughDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Paschall v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025