Legal Opinion
James Robinett v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1991No. 90-2123PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY WOODS, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Railroad Retirement Board, adopting the findings and decision of the Appeals Referee, found that the petitioner was not disabled, as prescribed by 45 U.S.C. § 231a(a)(l)(v) 1 , so as to be eligible for Railroad Retirement annuities. This court has jurisdiction to hear the petitioner’s appeal, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 355(f) and 45 U.S.C. § 231g. Because the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, we reverse.
II. FINDINGS OF THE BOARD
The Board adopted the Referee’s findings that the petitioner was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- John F. Williams v. U. S. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Curtis R. Peterson v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Darrell D. Arp v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Joe W. BROWN, Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vincent D. Bowman v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Edwin G. Kleinberg v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- John R. Scott v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993