Legal Opinion

United States v. Kleinbard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1971No. Crim. 71-328PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HAROLD K. WOOD, District Judge.

Defendant Herbert B. Kleinbard, has moved to dismiss his indictment which charges him with the unlawful sale of a controlled stimulant drug. Defendant alleges that he has been denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and that the delay between the time of the alleged offense and the time of his indictment constituted a denial of due process.

On May 4, 1970, defendant made a sale of 235 grams of methamphetamine to agents of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs in Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania. He was not arrested at that time. He made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Raymond R. Woody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl Henry JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. De RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State v. StulceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. WilfordDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. Soto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API