Legal Opinion

Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1998No. 97SC587Published

1Opinion of the Court

961 P.2d 487 (1998)

Doris E. PETERMAN, John H. Peterman, Sally Joseph, and Penny Hardrick, Petitioners,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Respondent.

No. 97SC587.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 29, 1998.

Law Offices of Steven Taffet, Steven Taffet, Boulder, Harshman & McBee, Donald McBee, Grand Junction, for Petitioners.

James R. Alvillar, Grand Junction, for Respondent.

Breit, Bosch, Levin and Coppola, P.C., Bradley A. Levin, Denver, for Amicus Curiae The Colorado Trial Lawyers Association.

Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

We…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API