Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1969No. 40252PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The defendant waived a jury trial in this prosecution for robbery and was found guilty by the court. The sole contention on appeal is that the denial of the defendant’s constitutional right to have counsel present at a police lineup, in which he was identified by the principal witness against him, tainted the prosecution’s case against him to the extent that his conviction cannot stand.

It is conceded by the prosecutor that the defendant was not advised of his right to have counsel present at the lineup. However, the prosecutor urges that the denial of this right resulted in no prejudice to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. RedmondWashington Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GefellerWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United States v. Jimmie Dale PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. GuilloryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API