Legal Opinion

Lane v. STEWART ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS,’J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action by plaintiff, Ebert S. Lane, against the defendants, Vern Stewart and Esther Stewart, for personal injuries. Subsequent to verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendants moved for a new trial. Prom an order sustaining defendants’ motion for new trial, plaintiff appeals.

On September 6, 1956, plaintiff was operating a truck-tractor in a southerly direction on highway 101 at a point approximately 13 miles north of the city of Florence, Oregon. Plaintiff was approaching a sharp left-hand curve in said highway. Defendant Vern Stewart was at said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Aune v. Oregon Trunk RailwayOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cederoth v. COWLESOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rogers v. Hexol, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1962
  4. Oliver v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Oliver v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API