Legal Opinion

Miller v. Todd

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1988No. 49A02-8701-CV-18PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellant-plaintiff Carolyn S. Miller (Miller) appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment for appellees-defendants U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp. and Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd. [hereinafter collectively referred to as Suzuki], claiming that the trial court erred in determining there were no genuine issues of material fact and that Suzuki was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the absence of crash bars on a motorcycle is an open and obvious danger.

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the non-moving party indicate that on August 21, 1982, Miller was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Bemis Co., Inc. v. RubushIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Koske v. Townsend Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jackson v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Miller v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nicholson v. Yamaha Motor Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Rowson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API