Legal Opinion

Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. Greeson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1987No. 68S01-8712-CV-1109PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The question is whether an Indiana court should apply Indiana tort law when both parties are residents of Indiana and the injury occurred in Illinois.

Plaintiff Elizabeth Greeson, an Indiana resident, filed a wrongful death action in Indiana against defendant Hubbard Manufacturing Co., Inc., an Indiana corporation. The defendant corporation built lift units for use in cleaning, repairing, and replacing streetlights.

On October 29, 1979, Donald Greeson, plaintiff's husband and also a resident of Indiana, happened to be working in Illinois maintaining street lights. He died…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bemis Co., Inc. v. RubushIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Nucor Corporation v. Aceros Y Maquilas De Occidente, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mohammed A. Kamel, D/B/A Al Muraa Establishment v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc. And Elias Ephrem Abou-ChedidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API