Legal Opinion
United States v. Cuellar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2007No. 05-10065PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
We took this case en banc to consider whether the government presented sufficient evidence at Cuellar’s trial to support his conviction of international money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(i). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove all elements of the offense. We also consider Cuellar’s arguments that the district court erred in admitting the expert testimony of Agent Nuckles, which arguments were unnecessary for the panel to address under its disposition of the case. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
On July…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Arthur C. Bieganowski, M.D., Richard J. Goldberg, C.P.A., Gustavo Diaz, and Jesse Jaime LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jerry Washington and Herbert Edward JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cuellar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. SkillingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.