Legal Opinion

Rabinovitz v. Kilner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1985No. [No. 85, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The suit below was by the appellant, the favored driver under the right of way statute, to recover damages resulting from a collision between his truck and that of the appellee at an intersection where there was neither a traffic light nor traffic warning signs. The jury found for the defendant, the appellee here. The appellant claims that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury. The charge presented, in the generalities customary in these cases, the elements of proximate cause, burden of proof, negligence and contributory negligence, and damage. As the meat of the charge, there was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Taxicab Co. v. OttenritterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Hopper, McGaw & Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Scholtes v. McColganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Kane Ex Rel. Eastern Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Shaneybrook v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Haas v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Burns v. GoynesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API