Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 18, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHELLEY, Judge.

The sole question raised in this appeal is whether the underinsured provision of a motor vehicle insurance policy covers punitive damages.

The facts are undisputed. The appellee, Michael Wilson, purchased motor vehicle insurance from appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). The policy included an underin-sured endorsement, which provided:

We will pay damages for bodily injury an insured is legally entitled to collect from the owner or driver of an underin-sured motor vehicle. The bodily injury must be caused by accident arising out of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Knight Ex Rel. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Price v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BenenatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Fidelity National v. Osborn III Partners LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API